52 Films by Women Vol 9. 37. Palestine 36 (Director: Annemarie Jacir)

 


Pictured: British High Commissioner Wauchope (Jeremy Irons, centre) launches Radio Palestine in a scene from writer-director Annemarie Jacir's historical drama, 'Palestine 36'. Still courtesy of British Film Institute / Curzon (UK)

Ambitious and necessary, writer-director Annemarie Jacir’s passion project, Palestine 36, experienced such a troubled production history than even Apocalypse Now helmer Francis Coppola would say, ‘that’s not for me’. A historical drama that charts the encroachment on Palestinian land by Jewish settlers, the film had to suspend production following Hamas’ attack on Israel on 7 October 2023. Israel struck back carrying out a military campaign in Gaza that killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, including children, and displaced hundreds of thousands more. The press was not spared in Israel’s campaign either; some 248 journalists covering the conflict have been killed. A review is not the place to discuss Israel’s reaction. Jacir’s film shows the seeds. It suggests that Palestinian families’ non-registration of land ownership led to easy expropriation by those supporting the resettlement of European Jews escaping anti-Semitism. It further suggests that Britain, which nominally governed Palestine under League of Nations Mandate, privileged the interests of European Jews for support for its empire. Jacir uses multiple viewpoint characters to show Palestinian reaction to enforced displacement. Acknowledging that it might seem trivial to have done so, she continued the film in Jordan returning much later to Palestine.

Jacir’s film begins with colourised newsreel footage (in narrow format) of life in Palestine before expanding her screen to show the launch of Palestine Radio, attended by representatives from the Arab and Jewish communities. The British High Commissioner, Wauchope (Jeremy Irons) tells the assembled crowd that the broadcaster will not disseminate political content, rather foster cultural understanding. We don’t find out whether the station achieved its objective. The point is to show that any discussion of politics is suppressed, the first of many scenes that has contemporary resonance.


Pictured: Private Secretary Thomas Hopkins (Billy Howle) tries to give journalist Khuloud (Yasmine al Massri) cause for optimism in a scene from the historical drama, 'Palestine 36', written and directed by Annemarie Jacir. Still courtesy of British Film Institute / Curzon (UK)

Our initial viewpoint character is Yusuf (Karim Daoud Anaya), a young man with a crimp in his collar – he put on a tie without attending to the rest of his appearance – who works for a newspaper publisher. Expecting to find him in his office, he meets Khuloud (Yasmine Al Massri), an influential journalist wearing her husband’s suit who has her work published under a male pseudonym. She is Jacir’s second viewpoint character, an articulate Palestinian who is opposed to land seizures. Yusuf’s father would rather he work at their farm, but Yusuf prefers his job. It puts him in proximity to the British. At a party, being taught to pour a drink, he meets Jacir’s third viewpoint character, Thomas Hopkins (Billy Howle), Private Secretary to the High Commissioner. Thomas is a fixer and a pragmatist, but by the end of the film, he says he will no longer be complicit with British foreign policy, a position that has contemporary resonance. In 2025, 300 British Civil Servants working at the UK Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office wrote to the then Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, making the same point. Rather than address it, their joint Permanent Under Secretaries, Oliver Robbins and Nick Dyer, offered them the opportunity to resign as an ‘honourable’ alternative, their language being backward-looking. Thomas conveys the message that Palestinians should register their land as a first step (it is inferred to prevent seizure). His diametric opposite is Captain Wingate (Robert Aramayo), a British officer whose long hair offends the locals as much as his insensitivity. Wingate allows his officers to make lewd comments about local women and enforces the law with disdain for Palestinians.

Jacir’s fourth viewpoint character is a young boy who assists a priest, asking why his parishioners request forgiveness from him. ‘They don’t ask me for forgiveness, they ask God,’ he explains. The priest is simply a conduit. Jacir isn’t interested in presenting characters as fully rounded. They too are conduits for a larger point about Palestinian resilience and the righteousness of their cause.

Jacir uses the recurring motif the erection of watch towers, ensuring that newly annexed land is not retaken by force. Wanting to discuss this with Jewish leaders, bypassing the British, Yusuf’s father and some other men attempt to cross into the Jewish sector by night. The watch tower guards open fire, killing Yusuf’s father. The community’s attempt to bury him ends with mass internment. Yusuf attempts to give family members water from the other side of barbed wire. Wingate stops him with a violent blow.

The British are keen to quell the resistance and search for evidence of support. In another scene of contemporary resonance, we see resistance members board a train and demand cash and valuables from passengers. The Palestinian passengers surrender jewellery willingly, even when one resistance member points to a wealthy woman’s pearl earrings and says, ‘they will be useful as well.’

Meanwhile a delegation of women appears at the High Commission. Thomas is sent to appease them, stating that the High Commissioner is busy. The women are insistent. In the next scene, the women plead their case. The High Commissioner informs them that there will be an official review of the situation carried out by the Peel Commission. This announcement gives the women some hope.

However, the land seizures continue unabated, eliciting a reaction. We see an officer get his shoes cleaned by the young boy who appears to be doing better than a pair of women selling vegetables. The officer turns a corner and there’s an explosion. Much of the violence depicted in the film is shown in part, either in the corner of the frame or through an explosion that masks fatalities. Jacir’s camera doesn’t linger over Palestinian victims. She knows her audience has seen far too many dead bodies.

As Jacir shows, the odds are stacked against Palestinian justice. Yusuf attends a meeting of Palestinian elders. He is asked for his opinion and gives it in lay terms, without nuance. He is then asked not to make any further contribution. His employer starts publishing a column ostensibly by a Palestinian arguing the Jewish case. Later, Khuloud discovers the payments he received for doing so, after she pseudonymously responds to pro-Jewish propaganda.

There is further violence, with Palestinian homes searched by the British. They find a sheaf that formerly contained a weapon. An old pistol is hidden away. Towards the end of the film, a young girl who buried it discovers that it has been recovered.


Pictured: A still from the production of 'Palestine 36' (hence the mixture of period costume and contemporary attire), written and directed by Annemarie Jacir. Photo courtesy of MAD Distribution (A MAD Solutions Company). 

We see an injured resistance fighter hiding in a cave. His presence is discovered by the shoeshine boy and the girl. The fighter is fed by the community and acknowledges the children with a watery smile.

In the most devasting act of violence committed by the British, Palestinians – including the Priest - are loaded on to a truck that then passes over a landmine. Yusuf joins the resistance. Thomas visits Khuloud and her husband as they consume a meal by candlelight to inform them that the Peel Commission did not conclude in Palestinian favour. Rather it advocated the creation of a country for re-settled European Jews. In another scene, Thomas attends a meeting chaired by the High Commissioner in which a counter-espionage expert (Liam Cunningham), lately returned from India, advises on how to strike back against Palestinian resistance fighters.

The film ends with a focus on children. The shoeshine boy flees the scene, having put the recovered pistol to use. A young girl who initially hid the weapon runs towards the camera. Jacir shows the seeds of resistance coming to flower. Her film isn’t particularly subtle, but it positions actions against Palestinians as Europe’s fault. It is an attempt to rebalance the narrative, showing Palestinians as cultured and pluralistic. Balanced narratives may finally help nurture solutions.

Reviewed at Curzon Westgate Canterbury (Screen Two), Kent, Thursday 6 November 2025, 14:30 screening

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

52 Films by Women Vol 9. 3. If I Had Legs I’d Kick You (Director: Mary Bronstein)

‘Superman’ Fan Event – Leicester Square, London, 2 July 2025

52 Films by Women Vol 9. 28. The Kidnapping of Arabella (Director: Carolina Cavalli)