52 Films by Women Vol 3. 20. PROFESSOR MARSTON AND THE WONDER WOMEN (Director: Angela Robinson)
There aren’t many films about real-life comic book writers. The documentary Crumb and the Harvey Pekar biopic American Splendor starring Paul Giamatti spring to mind - until I saw it, I thought the latter was about a sugar substitute. We have seen characters who write comic books, such as the hero of Condorman as played by Michael Crawford. For reasons best known to Hollywood, no one has wanted to tell the story of Charles M Schulz (1922-2000), author of the ‘Charlie Brown and Snoopy’ newspaper strips, or Jim Davis, the creator of ‘Garfield’, the lasagne loving cat, or even Art Spiegelman, the author of ‘Maus’. Writing a comic strip is not (yet) considered a noble profession. Part of the reason is that because we are so drawn to their creations, we don’t want to think about who first drew them - you don’t want to know who created a deity. The real issue is that the lives of comic book writers are not overly dramatic. The principle narrative that you can construct is about the struggle to get – or remain – published. It’s about censorship. I don’t think Charles M Schulz faced that problem.
Kudos go to Angela Robinson, the director of Professor
Marston and the Wonder Women, who has made the first mainstream(ish)
movie – bankrolled by Sony – about the creator of a major comic book icon. I
don’t know many people who can instantly name her alter ego (Diana Prince) but
Wonder Woman herself has instant recognition. My memory of her is through the
TV series of the 1970s as played by Lynda Carter, though I don’t recall the
first season being set during World War Two, the image of Wonder Woman on a skateboard,
the disembodied brain or cast members from The Brady Bunch making guest
appearances, which makes me wonder, was I even allowed to watch it?
Robinson’s film explains how Harvard academic William
Moulton Marston (Luke Evans), author of ‘Emotions for Normal People’ sublimated
his ‘DISC’ theory into a popular comic book, first published by All-American
Comics in December 1941. DISC stood for ‘dominance, inducement, submission and
compliance’ and set out how folks were happy to be dominated if they had an
inducement to do so, how submission was a conscious act that led to the
pleasures of compliance. Women, it turns out, do the dominating, represented in
Marston’s life by his spouse Elizabeth (Rebecca Hall, sparky, embittered but
alive) and his student, Olive Byrne (Bella Heathcote) who helped him perfect
the lie detector, an invention he and his wife created but never patented.
The most fun part of the movie has Elizabeth confront Olive
and ask her not to sleep with her husband. Then William gets wind of it and
sits Olive down with Elizabeth for a little talk. They become a threesome.
Olive’s and later William’s answers during a test of the lie detector make
Elizabeth realise that the answers to the questions has to matter – the
individual has to have some emotional engagement with their response.
What has this got to do with ‘DISC’ theory? Olive eventually
becomes compliant with the couple’s wishes and they engage in social
experiments. At one point, William and Elizabeth watch as Olive enters a
sorority, resulting in her spanking another woman. William is keen to know how
it made her feel. Eventually, William fathers a child with Olive, binding the
threesome together. When Olive moves in with the couple, the father is
explained as a man who ran away.
The drama is framed by a hearing at which William is forced
to defend his creation from the Child Study Association of America, represented
by Josette Frank (Connie Britton). We see copies of comic books gathered door
to door and then thrown onto a bonfire.
Can William save his creation from the prudes? It’s not even
a question. We know from the fate of film noir that the powerful women of the
1940s were eventually domesticated. The femme fatale was replaced by the
housewife, the thriller by the melodrama. A caption tells us that Gloria
Steinem catapulted Wonder Woman back into the cultural consciousness in 1972
and declared her an icon, with her lasso of truth and invisible jet plane.
Because the film has a cultural icon at its centre, it
actually neglects the two women who both loved William and, it seems, each
other – Elizabeth is definitely attracted to Olive. Its portrayal of desire is
limited to a brief bondage scene discovered by a neighbour, the result of which
is that William’s young son is bullied at school. It raises a secondary
question: who analyses the psychoanalysts, testing their theory against their
actual behaviour? Instead of being an acute psychological drama, it turns into
a romp, dwelling on the barely secret kinkiness of the Wonder Woman with the
recurring motif of her being tied up then releasing herself from bondage.
Worse, the film doesn’t attempt to answer the question, what
happens to a man’s desire when he allows himself to be dominated by a strong
woman? Is this simply an act to be reciprocated by the woman? In sex games, is
there one final dominant act? Robinson is not concerned with this. Her interest
is in celebrating the terrific trio, whose relationship is finally cut short.
Professor Marston and the Wonder Women only feels like half a
movie. It begins with William as the principal viewpoint character, but then
shifts to the defence of a fictional character. In reality, Olive is the
character that we are most interested in. What was she hoping to get from
William’s classes? How did she feel about Elizabeth? Did she become an
authentic feminist or was she too submissive? In the end, the film is more
concerned with the integrity of a comic book character than any of people in
it. For a film about sexual pleasure, it lacks a climax.
Reviewed at Febiofest
2018, Cinestar Andel, Prague, Saturday 17 March 2018, 14:30 screening
Comments
Post a Comment