52 Films by Women Vol 5. 51. SIBYL (Director: Justine Triet)
What makes a person decide to become an artist? Usually, it
is the kick out of showing work to others and receiving adoration in return.
One can be funnelled towards writing, painting, composing or the other creative
arts as a young person, but essentially the impulse to be an artist is no
different from that of being an athlete. There is a high degree of narcissism
and false modesty. The worst impulse is to believe that the art you create is
meaningful to others and that it performs an important function. Your art can
indeed be meaningful, in the sense of illuminating an issue that is little
understood. It can undoubtedly give others pleasure. Whether it performs an
important function is moot. A set of favourite films will tell you something
about the person who chose them – about how they see themselves. ‘Important’
films, those with a strong moral imperative, are rarely on those lists because
they tend to look at the darker aspects of humanity, the atrocities we are
prepared to commit to justify our way of life. These atrocities in turn are
narcissistic; genocide is motivated by a false sense of our own importance as
people.
Director Justine Triet’s film, Sibyl, explores
the urge to create. It depicts art as an excuse to break confidence – the end
(in this case a novel) being the product of betraying a relationship. It also
shows art being created as a relationship is broken in front of the camera. At
its centre, we are asked to believe that a psychiatrist, the titular Sibyl
(Virginie Efira) would want to abandon her profession to go back to writing
fiction. She has, as we discover, issues. Her creative writing mentor, Gabriel (Niels
Schneider) left her with a child to raise. Her mother was a drunk and Sibyl,
who attends Alcoholics Anonymous classes, fights to keep herself sober.
Schneider and Efira have form, having appeared together in Catherine Corsini’s Un
Amour Impossible (2018), in which Schneider played a man who refused to
acknowledge his ex-lover’s child.
Indeed, Efira and Schneider became a couple during the production of
Corsini’s film.
Triet, who co-wrote the script with Arthur Harari - he
appears in the film as Sibyl’s psychiatrist - begins the film with a series of
single master shots in which the camera slowly zooms in. As the credits roll,
we see Sibyl sitting next to a bespectacled man in a Yo Sushi-type
restaurant. The man is midway through a diatribe.
‘Writers basically take readers hostage,’ Sibyl is told as
dishes are conveyed past her. ‘You’re forcing someone to spend five, six,
seven, eight hours in your brain. People have less time now. Ten years ago you
had a minor bestseller. Now people are saturated with information. They have
every excuse not to read. The fact is, that writers have less legitimacy now, than
ever before. Not to discourage you but ten years ago was the wrong time to
leave and become a shrink. I felt so bad. It was like a suicide. Someone with a
deliberate waste of talent. I felt that I cut myself off emotionally.’
From this we deduce that Sibyl’s lunch companion is her
former literary agent or at least someone who was invested in her career.
‘Right,’ replies Sibyl, working her chopsticks and showing
no sign of being emotionally invested in the man’s words.
‘Sorry to be so frank,’ he continues, ‘but you need to know
the score. You say writing is your priority again. Superb! Superb! But we both
know inspiration is a lie and hard work is pointless. People write like crazy
and end up with nothing. They think they have an idea, but fiction is not a
subject.’
We can see the hurt in Sibyl’s face, though she says
nothing. Clearly this isn’t the pep talk she was hoping for.
‘Fiction is about elements, triggering a process. Or it can
be a pre-existing process, like a news item. That can work. Julian Dars wrote
about an American who killed her roommate in Italy, caught between two justice
systems.’ [He is referring to Amanda Knox who was convicted for the 2007 murder
of Meredith Kercher.] ‘A crazy case, beauty on trial. Adêle Simonie has a book coming
out about the text message murder case. This girl texted a suicidal friend
until he killed himself. Talk about great chick lit.’ Now he’s being insulting.
Sibyl pauses, turning to her meal, then back to her
companion. ‘Thanks for your advice, Basile,’ she remarks, hesitantly. ‘Listen,
I’m here to help you,’ Basile replies. Sibyl tries to be more appreciative of
his time. Basile cuts her off. ‘I’m glad you’re back,’ he says. ‘Send me your
stuff.’ ‘Perfect,’ Sibyl replies.
The film abruptly cuts to Sibyl in her office. She is
telling her patient, Boris, that she will no longer treat him and will refer
him to a colleague. He is furious. ‘Isn’t it terrifying enough to have lived
this life and [then] to have told it to a total stranger?’ In Boris’ words,
Sibyl has stolen his ‘work’, ‘seven years of my life’. He places the backs of
his hands against his cheeks. ‘I’m going to drop dead.’ Not a great start to a
resumption of her literary career.
Piano music kicks in. It is night. It is raining. The camera
zooms into a building, specifically an apartment building. The cast list is
superimposed over this slow zoom. We can see a figure at a desk.
Sibyl gets out of her car in the rain and runs to the
building, using her red jacket as an impromptu umbrella. By this point, four
minutes into the film, we think we might be watching a thriller. Sibyl enters her apartment, the door behind
her cluttered with pictures. A candle is lit. The light switch doesn’t work.
There is a flash of lightning from outside and the sound of thunder, before
Sibyl’s sister, Edith (Laure Calamy) and two children appear, singing ‘happy
birthday’ to her in English. (We can see
the oven clock, indicating it is 21:05). Sibyl’s husband, Etienne (Paul Lamy)
stands behind the children. Sibyl tells him she has left most of her patients
to focus on her novel. ‘I think it’s great,’ says Edith, though in time we will
learn that she resents her sister’s tranquillity, an ability not to be defined
by trauma. ‘But how you will your patients feel?’ asks Etienne. ‘What if a
surgeon said, mid-operation, goodbye, I’m off to write.’ Sibyl doesn’t answer.
‘A bit of guilt never hurt,’ Etienne adds.
The inciting incident comes with a telephone call from a
hospital. Margot (Adèle Exarchopoulos), a young actress at the start of her
career, is desperate to speak to a psychiatrist. She has a decision to make and
needs help. Margot has discovered that she is two months pregnant. The father
is her co-star, Igor (Gaspard Ulliel). Margot feels that she cannot keep the
baby. Moreover, she does not want to tell Igor, who is in a relationship with
the film’s German director, Mika (Sandra Hüller). Sibyl doesn’t want to
take on a new patient, though she reveals that she has kept a few. She
reluctantly treats Margot, who makes particular demands on her, notably that
she speaks to Igor on the set of the film; Margot clearly has no idea how the
patient-psychiatrist relationship is supposed to work, but then neither does
Sibyl, whose blank screen – the first page of her new novel – haunts her. Sibyl
starts to write about Margot, exploiting her confidence. Her agent is very
pleased by the pages.
In Greek mythology, sibyl, or Sibylla, were prophetesses,
relating the future in writing. The film’s Sibyl relates the present. She is
tortured by flashbacks, involving her sister, who thinks Sibyl trivialised
their mother. ‘Go back to your silly songs,’ she tells her at a party, during
which Sibyl performed Peggy Lee’s ‘Fever’, forgetting some of the words. (We
wonder whether the party might be the launch of Sibyl’s first novel, the ‘minor
best seller’ mentioned by Basile.) She also recalls her intense relationship
with Gabriel. At one point, they make love. Much of the sex scene is captured
in a single take with Sibyl (naked) on top of Gabriel before Gabriel takes
control. The purpose of this flashback is to pre-figure a later scene, shot
very differently and fully clothed, in which Sibyl betrays her patient.
The exploration of ‘creativity’ extends to Sibyl’s children,
specifically her eldest, who was fathered by Gabriel. In a wicked mood, Edith
instructs the child in how to emotionally manipulate her mother, asking her to
tell Sibyl that she feels low and worthless. The language the child uses is
adult and inappropriate but Sibyl’s mothering instinct kicks in immediately,
collapsing to her knees and embracing the child, comforting her with a reassuring
hug.
Children are the creations that we cannot control. We can
only guide them and endeavour to instil some sense of morality. Triet does not
examine parenting. However, the one patient that Sibyl does not abandon is a
young boy, who plays Monopoly with her during his sessions. He will only answer
questions during the game – Sibyl can only ask one at a time. He asks her a
question too. ‘What’s your favourite place?’ ‘My office,’ Sibyl replies, ‘it is
where I feel most control.’ At the end of the session, the boy says, ‘you want
to ask me what my favourite place is’. However, the rules that they have set
out do not allow this. In another session, he reveals it is an airing cupboard.
‘Why?’ ‘Because it has a lock on the inside.’ In another session still, he
reveals that he listens to the last song that he and his mother heard together
before she was killed in a car crash.
Somewhat improbably, Sibyl is summoned to the volcanic
island of Stromboli, where she has the role of acting as intermediary between
Margot and everyone else, but especially Mika and Igor. At one point we see
Sibyl with Mika, watching a scene through a monitor. I found myself wondering,
‘wow, they would really allow that?’ A
slapping scene is shot – and shown – multiple times. Sibyl finds herself
standing in for Igor during a musical number, in which she sings in Italian.
Sibyl is pretty good but at a certain point (again) words fail her. Margot’s
face explodes into joy and laughter, the trauma of her abortion decision
temporarily lifted.
In her few brief scenes, Hüller takes over the film. It
isn’t just that she is acting in English with confidence and panache, but that
she is playing a director who is repressing her emotions for the sake of the
film – and lets everyone know it. She is the most honest and bravest character
in the film. Unlike Margot, she is trying to do it alone, knowing that her
lover has betrayed her. At one point, during a poorly acted scene on a yacht,
in which Igor objects to his performance being interpreted knowing that the
camera can only see the back of his head, Mika has had enough and plunges into
the water, leaving the crew to finish the scene. Sibyl is volunteered as director
and coaxes Margot and Igor through a love scene.
Sibyl’s role on the film doesn’t end well – never go for a
walk with a performer. In the film’s climax, ten months later, she attends the
premiere, attempts to sing a sing in Italian again – but after a confident and
commanding start cannot remember all the words, another singer taking over from
her and attempting to drown her out. Sibyl causes further drunken mayhem until
she is led away. Quite how she got into the premiere party, given her
ignominious departure – we’ll never know. ‘It is better that you say nothing,’
Mika tells her at the end of stay on Stromboli. Margot takes Sibyl home and
tells her she has read her novel. ‘I am flattered,’ she says, perhaps resenting
that her life story has been appropriated but not showing it. In any case, on
the island, Margot went on a wrecking spree in Sibyl’s room after her slip.
When she is about to smash the laptop, Sibyl cries, ‘no, not that.’
Acknowledging her drunken state, Etienne will not let Sibyl inside.
There are two codas. One that confirms that Sibyl is sober,
the second involves Gabriel at a fairground. Finally, Sibyl is left with her
own creation, the one that has a trace of her, unlike her second novel.
The film-within-a-film in-jokes amuse. ‘Why did you film on
Stromboli?’ Mika is asked. ‘I wanted to film away from home, to be different.’
(We expect her to acknowledge Roberto Rossellini.) There is also a male
producer who speaks to Sibyl in English, offering her a drink and a marijuana
joint, both of which she declines. (I think he is supposed to represent any
number of predatory men on a film set.) The film doesn’t really answer the
question, why create? Then again, it doesn’t have to. On one hand, the film is
Triet’s reflection on being a film director, not being in control of all the
elements. On the other, there is the desire to tell stories, not just to
listen. The film is only marginally more closed than Sibyl’s psychiatric
patients, for whom therapy is a process not an event. The real question the
film asks is: how connected does an author have to be to the story that they
are telling? In some ways, Sibyl faced Margot’s dilemma herself and chose to
have the child. (Her situation was less loaded – she didn’t face losing her job
and career in the same way that Margot does.) Sibyl too experienced intense
desire, as Margot did, the feeling of being looked at in a certain way.
Ultimately, the answer is that you can deal with the issues in your own life as
fiction when they appear to be someone else’s.
Reviewed on Saturday 24 July 2021 on Mubi.com (streaming
service)
Comments
Post a Comment