52 Films by Women Vol 10. 28. VIRGINIA WOOLF'S NIGHT AND DAY (Director: Tina Gharavi)

 


Pictured: Best friends but unsuitable for marriage, cousins William Rodney (Jack Whitehall, left) and Katharine Hilbery (Haley Bennett, right) in the film adaptation, 'Virginia Woolf's Night and Day', scripted and produced by Justine Waddell and directed by Tina Gharavi. Still courtesy of Vue Lumiere (UK)

Of all the films I have so far covered in this volume, Virginia Woolf’s Night and Day adapted by writer-producer Justine Waddell and directed by Tina Gharavi is by far the least satisfactory. I am loathe to describe it as a film, more a set of well-intentioned impulses that chew the cud in various corners of an enormously large field. Look over there, we have some suffragettes. Directly opposite, a suppressed same sex romance only acknowledged after one of the party has died. There’s a woman fascinated by the stars who wants to be admitted to the Royal Astrological Society and, when that doesn’t work out, applies to study at Oxford. There is a comedy subplot involving the protagonist’s mother who has written 597 pages over a number of decades of a text that may constitute a book. The protagonist has a comedy admirer, her best friend, who would dearly like to marry her because it is expected. There is the spectre of World War One, which plays no part in Woolf’s 489-page novel, but into which one of the characters will be swallowed.

In reviewing this film, I undertook due diligence, which is to say, I picked up a copy of the novel and looked at the beginning and the end. In national government, this counts as a thorough analysis. Suffice to say I did not recognise the movie, although a character called Katharine Hilbery (American actress Haley Bennett appearing to channel Florence Pugh) does appear and is first described in company pouring a cup of tea. The Katharine of the film is first glimpsed skinny-dipping in Hampstead Pond and staring up at the stars. City of lights, are you shining out for me? If Gharavi had turned the novel into a musical, it might have worked better.

I don’t believe that Gharavi had a mood board, rather a set of actors’ curriculum vitae. Timothy Spall is rather good at portraying apoplectic fathers who have sent their emotional intelligence to boarding school from which it did not return. Jennifer Saunders can embody a vague and inconsequential wife lost in the self-importance of a never-ending task; Absolutely Fabulous the television series ran far too long. Jack Whitehall can play an ineffectual twit so well that he practically sews his performance into a straight-jacket right before our eyes. Lily Allen exudes naturalism and gets to the point. The gay best friend – yes, it is ‘club trope-i-cana’ here in 1910 Hampstead – looks like he might remove his fake moustache at any second. Then there’s Frances Barber who is fiercely angry. You can relate, not least when a door is opened and her papers fly around the room. None of the actors appears to be in the same movie as their neighbour as they orbit around Bennett, who was recently seen as Widow Clicquot. Watching this film, I could certainly use some French bubbly.


Pictured: Mrs Hilbery (Jennifer Saunders, left) inspects the finger of her daughter Katharine (Haley Bennett) in the company of William Rodney (Jack Whitehall, 2nd right) and Mr Hilbery (Timothy Spall, right) in a scene from the film adaptation, 'Virginia Woolf's Night and Day', scripted and produced by Justine Waddell and directed by Tina Gharavi. Still courtesy of Vue Lumiere (UK)

Gharavi not only required the services of two editors, Hansjörg Weißbrich and Ben Wilson but also the support of veteran editor Mick Audsley. I can only conclude this was necessary because of the lurches in tone, which include a character collapsing and dying and a dog that appears to be dead when a photograph is taken but subsequently registers signs of life.

Woolf’s novel rather resists adaptation – it certainly doesn’t court it – but is treated as a canvas onto which the film’s creators can inject gimmicks that may be considered in the spirit of the author’s later work. Woolf herself (as played by Erika Linder) makes a cameo appearance at a party.   Misia Butler, a transgender actor, is cast as Katharine’s cousin Cyril Otway, whom Katharine uses as a referee to get into university; Woolf later wrote the book (specifically Orlando) on gender fluidity. These decorations aren’t in themselves objectionable but cannot disguise the film’s lack of a coherent mise-en-scene. You watch and feel nothing, not even amusement.

It hardly matters that the film is a British German co-production with scenes shot in both countries. Gharavi keeps her camera close to the actors and uses stylised cutaways in an early scene in which Katharine (calling herself Kit) attends an all-male meeting at the Astronomy Society. The stamping of feet evokes the silencing of women in public places but is imagined by Katharine as she stands up (as a man) to argue for the admission of women. The motion is roundly rejected.


Pictured: Stargazing. Would-be astronomer Katharine Hilbery (Haley Bennett) in a scene from the film, 'Virginia Woolf's Night and Day', an English-German co-production scripted and produced by Justine Waddell and directed by Tina Gharavi. Still courtesy of Vue Lumiere (UK)

I would be remiss if I didn’t mention what I liked about the film, namely a pram pushed by Katharine that contains her stargazing equipment. It has large wheels that seem almost too thin, as if the minimum amount of metal were used (there’s a war coming). Props to the props department. The scenes between Katharine and Ralph Denham (Elyas M’Barek), a man later hired to edit her mother’s manuscript, suggest a meeting of equal minds and a potential romance which intentionally goes nowhere. Katharine doesn’t need a man to succeed, though it would be nice if her father approved. In one amusing aside, Katharine’s parents discuss where to display a letter from the university; her father suggests the lavatory. The street scenes feature a variety of shop windows that are well-dressed, though there are no butchers or grocers. (In Hampstead? Preposterous.)

Bathrooms are also referenced during Katharine’s university interview. There are no facilities for women. Katharine almost accepts rejection but then marches back to deliver a speech arguing that the university will one day accept women; the board will look back at this interview and regret their decision.

If only Waddell and Gharavi started by vividly describing what life was like in Edwardian England; 1910 saw the death of King Edward VII and the start of the reign of his successor, King George V, prior to the latter’s coronation on 22 June 1911. Did men want to forget that they were once ruled by a woman? Suffragettes – women who undertook organised action to obtain the right to vote – are introduced early on, as if that were the principal struggle of the time amongst the educated class. The film oscillates between comedy and protest. It is crude at both extremes.

At the very start, I was worried. The first sound we hear is of a body hitting the water. I worried that this might be a suicide – Woolf has form. However, it is Katharine going for her swim. We are quickly introduced to William Rodney (Whitehall) who proposes to her – they’ve known each other since she was six years old. She rebuffs him, much to the disappointment of her parents who very much expect the engagement to be announced. Katharine’s father complains of his wife’s slow literary progress. Her note-making is all consuming; he wants her back. Katharine is keen to share her theory that stars that appear less bright in the sky are further away; luminosity is an indication of distance. Her discovery is later claimed by an American woman. Katharine struggles to read the article in her father’s newspaper. ‘You ripped it,’ he complains.

In a scene that appears from nowhere, Katharine is taken by William to a soirée in which he gives a reading – we don’t hear much of his work. There she meets suffragette Mary Datchet (Allen), who appears to be the most normal person in the room. Mary invites Katharine to her office, which contains a printing press and some metal arms that go up and down – I could not discern their purpose. ‘The type is too small,’ Mary complains, as if somehow the typeface wasn’t previously decided.

Katharine doesn’t join the suffragettes. She is suffragette adjacent, in the same way that the film is comedy and drama adjacent. Instead, she focuses on establishing herself as serious about science. Marie Curie is never mentioned. When her father forbids her to study astronomy, Katharine decides to marry William to leave the family home. However, she knows in her heart that she cannot simply exploit him.

The big comic climax is the launch of Mrs Hilbery’s book, ‘The Elephant in the Room’. Saunders delivers a speech describing biographies are fiction. This is one of the few scenes that lands, though in a wilfully uneven movie, that isn’t saying much. A dinner scene in which Cyril’s father (Simon Phillips) complains that his son is a ‘Nancy’ is also effective, less so the response to the question, ‘do you know what a Nancy is?’ ‘A place in France,’ someone suggests.

There is little to recommend in the writing or direction of the film. This is not to suggest that Gharavi has no future as a film director, but she should choose material that better lends itself to cinematic storytelling. 

Reviewed at Screen Two, Crouch End Picture House, North London, Saturday 20 June 2026, 14:00 screening

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

52 Films by Women Vol 10. 3. ROYA (Director: Mahnaz Mohammadi)

52 Films by Women Vol 10. 9. THREE GOODBYES (Tre Ciotole) (Director: Isabel Coixet)

52 Films by Women Vol 10. 22. FINDING EMILY (Director: Alicia MacDonald)