52 Films by Women Vol 10. 31. JIMPA (Director: Sophie Hyde)
Hyde attempts to
make that most radical of dramas, one without conflict, in order to memorialise
her late father, on whom Jim is based, and to represent the non-binary. Watching
the film, you are reminded of the hang-out dramas of Richard Linklater, driven
by talk not action. This aesthetic choice has limited the commercial potential
of the film, which premiered at Sundance Film Festival in Utah in January 2025
and took a year to reach cinemas, though not in the UK where it went straight
to streaming. The presence of Colman and Lithgow, two internationally-recognisable
award-winning actors, didn’t help the film much.
Audiences might find
it initially hard to relate to a film that suggests that there is such a thing
as a non-traumatic family break-up. This tension plays out in the film’s
present as Hannah and her husband, Harry (Daniel Henshall) refuse to object openly
to their child’s choice. Neither wants to play the ‘bad cop’.
For a while, we are
happy to watch as Jim bequeaths Hannah his badge collection – he dug them out
prior to the family’s arrival. Hannah immediately fears the worst, but the
badges offer a potted social history of resistance and change; I would have
liked to have spent more screen time with them. Badges are a way of declaring
allegiance to a collective. The scene made me wonder what happened to my ‘ABC
Minors’ badge, given to children who attended Saturday morning cinema in the
1970s.
Jim – the Jimpa of
the title – has an assistant, Richard (Eamon Ferran) who collects Hannah and
the family from the airport. We learn that he has little to do. Jim is not
working on any new research. Jim has however applied for a job in Helsinki. He
flies there to take a meeting where he is told that he is not in the running. A
colleague whom he recommended will take the position.
Meanwhile Frances starts
hanging out with Isa (Zoë Love Smith) and espousing a fondness for
‘compersion’, defined as ‘the feeling of joy or happiness caused by seeing
someone you love experience happiness or romantic/sexual fulfilment with
someone else’. This feels disingenuous, a way of saying, ‘I know I’m not going
to be happy, so I’ll take pleasure in the happiness of others.’ I would suggest
that Frances hasn’t lived much. At any rate, when they see Isa with someone
else, they register jealousy. Pain isn’t something you can wish away, no matter
how you phrase it.
Jim takes Frances
out to meet his friends. The non-binary person is impressed. ‘My grand-thing
has quite the vocabulary,’ Jim declares, reflecting on a generation that seems
to be a lot better at defining itself, rolling their own pronouns where once
one simply smoked marijuana. We also see Jim on the pull, naked below the waist.
He had one significant other, Stephen (Deobia Oparei) but refused to be monogamous.
Meanwhile, Hannah’s
producers, seen in a series of zoom calls, express their scepticism about her project,
which she hasn’t mentioned to Jim. Avoiding conflict means never talking about
the things that matter. The issue is forced when Jim (off-screen) has another
stroke, losing the ability to communicate.
The final part of
the film is a conventional tearjerker. The first time we see Jim in his
debilitated state, answering questions by squeezing ‘yes’ or ‘no’ with his
hand, we are moved. Hannah tells him about her project, but obtaining
permission from a man in a weakened state seems wrong. Hannah comes across as a
coward.
Jim’s illness also
threatens Frances’ plans. However, there isn’t a scene in which they tell Jim
what he means to them; you sense Hyde didn’t want to put her own child through
that.
Hannah’s older
sister, Emily (Kate Box) comes to visit to say goodbye to her father. She also
puts Hannah straight, that, in fact, the family wanted to accompany Jim when he
decided to migrate to Amsterdam, but Jim refused. The break-up of the family
wasn’t as conflict-free as Hannah chose to believe. Nevertheless, Jim isn’t demonised
as selfish. Acceptance is the family’s
default setting.
The problem with a
film that purposely avoids drama is that it isn’t especially memorable. Hyde offers
some home movie footage of the (fictional) family in younger days, but it
doesn’t add much. There is an impactful flashback in which Frances presents
themselves to their class, coming across as confident and smug but not clearly
identified as part of a community. Frances doesn’t attract hate rather
indifference, as if the class resent having to be lectured but don’t want to
mention it. The producers of the film have positioned Jimpa as a teaching tool, a catalyst for discussion (evident on the film’s website). Many would have preferred catharsis.
Reviewed at Screen
Three, LantarenVenster, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Monday 29 June 2026, 13:45
screening

Comments
Post a Comment